News 4 min read

Infantino vs Uefa: The Criminal Case That Could Tear Football Apart

Marcus Osei
Marcus Osei Senior Football Writer & Analyst
Aug 28, 2026
Accuracy Checked
Infantino vs Uefa: The Criminal Case That Could Tear Football Apart

Real Madrid loanee scores first career hat-trick in stunning Lyon debut

Football has seen its fair share of political battles, but this one is different. Uefa is now pursuing criminal legal proceedings against Fifa president Gianni Infantino, accusing him of criminal mismanagement over a scrapped plan to sell stakes in the World Cup and other Fifa competitions to private investors. This is no longer just a boardroom dispute. It's a full-scale legal war.

The Plan That Started It All

Shortly after this summer's World Cup, Infantino pushed forward a proposal to create a new company called Fifa Forward Enterprise. The idea was to sell stakes in Fifa's biggest competitions, including the men's and women's World Cups, to private investors. He reportedly offered member associations $40 million each to back the plan.

The problem was how it was done. According to documents related to the legal proceedings, Infantino convened a hastily arranged internal meeting where some officials had never even heard of the scheme before being asked to sign off on it within hours. No independent valuation was carried out. The stakes were allegedly offered at what Uefa calls 'a fraudulently off-market price'. The proposed enterprise value of approximately $20 billion was described as 'absurdly low' given the commercial weight of what was being sold.

After widespread backlash, Infantino scrapped the plan. But Uefa was not prepared to move on quietly.

What Uefa Is Actually Claiming

Uefa's position is damning. The European governing body claims that the entire FFE structure was designed to allow Infantino and a small circle of associates to permanently profit from Fifa's most valuable assets, to the detriment of Fifa's 211 member associations. They are calling it a conspiracy that had been developed in secret for over a year before its public announcement.

Uefa is now applying to courts in Florida, New York and Colorado to access documents from Fifa businesses and key individuals involved in the deal. Among those named are investment firm Thrive Capital, its founder Josh Kushner, American bank JP Morgan, and former Formula 1 chief Greg Maffei, who is described as the key commercial adviser on the FFE transaction.

The endgame, as Uefa openly states, is to pursue criminal charges in Switzerland, where Fifa is headquartered in Zurich. Swiss law apparently supports Uefa's standing to file such a complaint, and their legal counsel has confirmed the process is within reasonable contemplation. Under Swiss law, a conviction for criminal mismanagement can result in a custodial sentence. That is a serious escalation.

Why This Is Bigger Than A Boardroom Row

The football story here is about power. Infantino has been seeking a fourth term as Fifa president, with the election due in March. His position is weakening by the day in Europe and parts of Asia, with the home nations withdrawing support and Concacaf, Uefa and the Asian Football Confederation all having accused him of breaking trust through deception.

But he is not without allies. South America's Conmebol and Africa's Caf are still backing him, and the influence of Saudi Arabia looms large in global football politics. Infantino likely felt the pressure ease when Uefa dropped its threat to boycott World Cups. The criminal proceedings are Uefa's way of making clear that the fight is far from over.

Uefa's own statement from Monaco says it all. Those present unanimously backed every available institutional, political and legal avenue to secure reform and restore proper limits on presidential authority. That language is pointed and deliberate.

Our Read on Where This Is Heading

Let's be direct. Uefa's goal here is almost certainly not to see Infantino convicted in a Swiss court. These things take years. The legal route is a pressure tactic, designed to force document disclosure, create reputational damage and make the prospect of continuing in office too uncomfortable to justify.

Whether it works is another question. Legal disputes in football have a history of dragging on without resolution, and Infantino has survived scrutiny before. If he retains enough support from Conmebol and Caf to win re-election in March, the criminal proceedings become a long-running backdrop rather than a knockout blow.

But the sheer scale of this, multiple court filings across three American states, criminal complaints being prepared in Switzerland, a list of named financiers and advisers, tells you that Uefa is not doing this for show. Something serious happened behind the scenes with the FFE plan, and Uefa clearly believes the documents will back that up.

Football has always had politics at its core. This particular fight, though, has moved into territory that the sport has never quite seen before.

Marcus Osei

Editorial Note: Marcus Osei

Senior football writer and tactical analyst with 12+ years covering the Premier League, Champions League, and world football. Born in Accra, raised between London and Kuala Lumpur.

Browse available content below.

18+

Gambling can be addictive. Play responsibly. BeGambleAware